Gavin Baker Rotating Header Image

Harvard faculty say yes to OA

Harvard University’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences yesterday adopted a mandate for open access to the college’s peer-reviewed research publications.

Already, there’s quibbling from others about whether the details of the policy are good or bad. But I want to focus on the fact that the faculty, through their own governance process, themselves approved this mandate. Despite earlier evidence of the willingness of faculty to comply with OA mandates, and the support of researchers for public access legislation, this is the strongest indication yet: Yes, Virginia, scientists do want open access.

So when Allan Adler of the AAP says

Publishers don’t oppose open-access plans per se, Adler said. It is mandates they take issue with … With Harvard’s opt-out provision, he said, there’s still “some degree of choice.”

– then he will be well-served to remember what dastardly external force imposed such an onerous requirement on the researchers. Oh, right: it was the researchers themselves.

3 Comments

  1. [...] on Harvard OA policy, February 13, 2008. The various articles cited include one by Gavin Baker, Harvard faculty say yes to OA, Journal of Insignificant Inquiry, February 13, 2008. Excerpt: … I want to focus on the fact [...]

  2. [...] as competitive pressure on non-OA publishers. The editorial begins by stating how the recent Harvard policysent a “cold shudder […] through the spine of the traditional publishing [...]

  3. [...] side are you on? You represent university presses. Remember, it was the university’s own faculty who voted to adopt this policy. Yet you are spreading fear, uncertainty, and doubt about the potential impact of green OA on [...]

Leave a Reply

  • Science dudes, are you even listening to me??